Water damage, roof torn off by a storm, flood … faced with these unforeseen, it is often necessary to react quickly to make the necessary repairs so that your property is damaged as little as possible. Yet our personal funds are not always able to cope with such emergencies, so many are turning to a loan solution.
Work is one of the five most common reasons for using credit. A practice thus widely diffused which invites however to the reflection.
Loan solution: assess the type of work to be done
There are several types of work that often require the use of a loan. These repairs, constructions or repairs are more or less urgent depending on the case and the necessary funds may exceed the funds available.
Long-standing renovation projects
In general, major renovations are often thought upstream. The necessary funds are collected for several months to meet the needs.
For this type of operation, banks offer loans on condition that renovations are justified. Some private financial institutions also offer lending solutions for this type of work, with the advantage of not requiring proof.
This is one of the fears of any owner: unplanned work. A water damage or damage caused by a storm must be settled immediately so as not to impact your property permanently and to depreciate the value. That is why to possess the necessary resources, the loan of urgent money is a frequent recourse.
Why use credit for urgent repairs?
There are several types of loans offered by different financial institutions. Choosing a particular type of credit depends on the importance of the work and the situation of each.
The traditional bank loan
By habit, in case of unforeseen events, we tend to turn to our bank to ask for a loan.
Yet when there is urgency, this solution is not the fastest. Going through a bank for a credit takes time for your file to be accepted. There are also many constraints such as justifying urgent work, or risking undermining your credit rating if you have problems repaying the loan. Fortunately in case of imperatives you can turn to faster solutions.
Instant loan: a quick fix
In an emergency, instant lending is an attractive alternative. The acceptance rate is fast (around 24 hours) because there is no credit check. Another advantage is that you do not need to justify your work to qualify.
These loan solutions are most often offered by private financial institutions. The procedures are simplified, you just have to fill out an online form to make a request and the answer is very fast.
Some banks now offer instant loans, but the terms of acceptance are stricter because such requests require a more thorough verification of your situation.
Unlocking funds to make major renovations through a loan or putting on the table his own personal funds, this is planned well in advance. However small urgent work caused for example by water damage or sudden deterioration of infrastructure, this is not expected. We must therefore react quickly despite sometimes lack of funds. That’s why instant lending is one of the best alternatives to unlock money quickly.
For any question or request, do not hesitate to contact our advisors or fill out our online form.
Even if you think that it is impossible for Canadians to be approved for a loan without a credit check, this is not the case. In Canada, loans without credit investigations are an excellent substitute for more traditional loans from banks or other major financial institutions. No credit check with your creditworthiness; instead, you will have to prove otherwise that your current financial situation can support additional financing.
Alternatives to credit surveys
So, if a lender does not require the credit inquiry to approve a loan, what does he need instead? As mentioned before, the lender will generally check creditworthiness through another form of valuation. If you choose to work with a lender who does not consider credit ratings in their underwriting procedures, you will typically need to provide one of the following:
Some lenders who do not take the credit rating into account will require you to provide them with bank statements to check how much money is in your monthly bank account. Lenders can thus ensure that you can actually support this loan. If you already have too much financial responsibility, a lender might not want to approve you a loan. There are many ways to do this, but here are some of the most common ones:
Instant banking verification. There are many programs that provide this service. You will log in to your online bank through the program your lender uses and will automatically take a snapshot of your account and build a report. Your lender sees a report, not your account information.
Electronic declarations. All banks offer electronic returns via their online banking portal, and a lender can request them to validate your financial situation.
Or you can simply fax your bank statements to your lender.
Documents to confirm your income
Another way for the lender to assess your creditworthiness without doing any credit check is to check your income. Lenders want to make sure that they will be reimbursed on a regular basis and it is important for them to only provide loans to people who have enough income to repay. Most lenders do not seek to create additional financial difficulties for their clients.
If you think your credit rating or financial history may be detrimental to your chances of being approved for a loan, you should consider providing collateral. Most secured loans do not require a credit check because your assets make your credit history less important. The guarantee protects the lender. This is a great way to get a personal loan that is $ 5,000 or more. With a secured loan, you will not have to accept a credit check and will have a better chance of getting a higher loan.
Lenders who do not check your credit rating
If you are looking for a loan from a bank or other more traditional financial institution a credit check is always required. This is how banks assess the creditworthiness of a potential borrower. If you know that your credit rating is not extraordinary, you could avoid applying for a loan from major financial institutions. If you want a fast, short term loan or simply without a credit survey, you should consider the following types of lenders:
Alternative lenders. Mostly found online, they are willing to work with borrowers who are rejected by the banks.
Private lenders. They do not need to follow the same strict guidelines as the banks.
Lenders specialized. Work with specialized lenders (for example, private mortgage lender or title lender).
The approval process without a credit check is based on more than just a 3-digit number. This means that more people are able to get approval for the loans they want and fewer people are rejected because of their past financial missteps. Lenders without credit inquiries are willing to work with you to find the loans, terms and products that best fit your borrower needs.
If, for one reason or another, you find yourself in a dead end on the financial side but you need a large amount of money to acquire a property or to make a payment, you will surely fall on option to apply for a private loan or for a payday loan. But what is a good option?
If you are tinkering with a loan until you get back to its basic state, you will notice that a loan is essentially made up of a few factors: the size of the loan, the loan term, and the cost of borrowing. Another noteworthy method is the method of payment required to repay the loan, as this is important when considering payday loans. In the same vein, ask yourself the following questions:
How much money do you need?
2. When do you need it? 3. How much can you afford to repay each month? (This concerns the cost of borrowing, for example the interest rate) 4. How long can you afford to make these payments?
If time is a factor, and the amount of money you need is less than $ 1500, then a payday loan would be the right choice. Payday loans are fast and convenient, and it works in a very simple way: you get the loan for which you applied and the day you get paid, a certain amount of money will be withdrawn from your bank account to repay your loan. This is a quick and convenient approach because you can get the loan you want very quickly and without having a headache, as long as you meet the loan qualification requirements.
Payday loans are known to be very expensive, but this cost is justified by the infallible automation offered by most lenders.
If you need a larger loan, your first option may be to opt for an unsecured private loan
Once again small (usually below $ 5000), this type of loan is not as “automatic” as a payday loan would be but quick enough to get (especially if you compare to something like a home equity loan). The method of repayment varies from lender to lender. The cost of an unsecured private loan is only a fraction of that of a payday loan.
If the cost (the interest rate) of a loan is important to you, then the unsecured loan may not be what you are looking for. For a loan to be negligible, the lender will want to have some kind of collateral in order to reduce the risk and the loss that would come with the event of a default. The usual assets that are used to obtain a loan are the vehicles or the goods. Individuals who are looking for smaller loans often avoid refinancing their home (the cost of breaking a mortgage may not be worth it) but rather opt for a better alternative: that of refinancing their mortgage. vehicle. This is a fairly easy thing to do if you own your vehicle or if your vehicle has a high value (if you have paid a large portion of the financing for your vehicle). If you have any questions about payday loans, private loans or car loans, do not hesitate to contact us by clicking here. What is the best option, do you think? Let us know by leaving a comment below.
The most attractive countries for residency by investment
The study for 2018 considered residency by investment programs in 21 countries. The first place was taken by Austria with the highest indicators of the quality of life and reputation of the country. The permanent leader of the past few years, Portugal was in second place.
To get a “golden visa”, you need to pay from 500,000 euros, there are programs from 250,000 euros.
Under the terms of the program in the country must spend at least 35 days in 5 years. During the existence of the program since 2014, more than 6 thousand investors received a “golden visa”. Most residence permits were issued to citizens of China, Brazil, and Russia. In the third position is the new program of Italy. It allows you to get a residence permit of the country through investments of EUR 500 thousand. The United Kingdom with the Tier 1 visa, which is popular among foreign investors, has risen by one position over the year and is now in 5th place.
To use the popular US investment program EB-5 you need to invest from 500 thousand dollars. That’s just the application of the investor will be considered for several years. In Greece, a residence permit is given to property owners, however, it should cost between 250,000 euros.
“In 2017, the demand for a Greek residence permit through investments grew by almost 40% compared to 2016. Most of the residence permits for the year were issued to citizens of China, Russia, and Turkey. Spain gives you the opportunity to get a residence permit for real estate investments from EUR 500 000 without the need to stay in the country. From 2013 to 2016, 2,236 foreign investors received a residence permit in Spain through investments, among investors 685 are citizens of Russia, ”says Irina Simonyan.
For the evaluation of the programs, 10 indicators were used: reputation, quality of life, taxation, visa-free entry to other countries, application review and quality of information processing, complex, investment requirements, general expenses, terms for obtaining citizenship and requirements for obtaining citizenship.
Independent experts from Thomson Reuters, Knight Frank, The Economist Intelligence Unit, Baker & McKenzie, Fragomen LLP took part in the rating. Investors and government officials from different countries were also interviewed. For each criterion, experts scored countries (from 0 to 10), after which the results were summed up.
Whether Kazakhstan will be able to interest investors with benefits and preferences is not yet clear. And it’s not just the bill. To get into the rating of programs for obtaining a residence permit, you need not only to provide foreigners with tax benefits but also to improve the level and quality of life of their own citizens.
“The task of the AIFC – and this applies not only to issues of investment residency and private banking – not so much to compete with developed centers, as fill the emerging niches. The welfare of Central Asian countries is growing, there are people with large capitals who will look for reliable management companies. what is the aim of the AIFC? Another question is what will be the level of trust in the Astana center, how good the exchange will be, how much the legal regime of the center will justify the expectations. It is necessary to understand that investors are feeds to London, not because there is British law and a modern trading platform operates, but because there is, firstly, a predictable and understandable environment, and secondly, a large number of issuers with assets that are interesting to the market, “explains Sergey Domnin.
Now the bill is under consideration in the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Developers are planning to submit it to Parliament for consideration in May-June 2019.
Not so long ago, we mistakenly wrote news about the sale of Kazakhstan citizenship for $ 150,000. Journalists did not interpret the information in this way, and this is not about citizenship, but about foreign investment. This practice is popular in many Western countries that do not give citizenship to all visitors, and investments in the country’s economy make it possible to legally live on its territory.
What will these investments give to foreigners in Kazakhstan? What preferences will they get? What and why do they want to change for them in the legislation of the country?
Who is an investor and what are his rights and benefits in Kazakhstan?
An investor is a natural and legal person making investments in the Republic of Kazakhstan.
The Law “On Foreign Investments” dated December 27, 1994, which had lost its force, had the concept of a national investor – an individual permanently residing in the Republic of Kazakhstan and (or) a legal entity of the Republic of Kazakhstan investing in the Republic of Kazakhstan.
With regard to benefits, under current legislation, tax preferences are granted to investors (reducing the amount of calculated corporate income tax by 100% – 10 years; applying 0 to land tax rates – 8 years; calculating property tax at 0 percent to the tax base – 8 years).
“At the same time, the number of investments in fixed assets must be at least two million times the monthly calculation indicator (as of the date of filing the application established by the law on the Republican budget). Investment preferences are provided for priority activities approved by the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 13 of January 14, 2016 “, – says the official response of the MID of the Republic of Kazakhstan to the editorial request.
What they want to change in Kazakhstan
According to this program, it is proposed to allow foreigners to obtain a residence permit of the Republic of Kazakhstan through investments and receive tax preferences.
The concept of “investment residency” in Kazakhstan was not previously. In order not to amend all the laws of the country, the developers proposed to launch an investment residence on the legal framework of the AIFC. That is, permission to reside in Kazakhstan to investors will be granted on the basis of an application from the administration of the financial center. The concept states that both the investors and their family members will be able to receive a residence permit.
To obtain a residence permit a foreigner must invest at least 150 thousand dollars:
in one or several investment funds registered in accordance with the regulations of the AIFC and managed by one or several management companies that have the relevant licenses of the AIFC regulatory body;
in securities traded on the AIFC;
to purchase real estate within the approved territory of the AIFC;
in any combination of the above options.
The developers believe that this program will help attract investments to the country.
“The estimated amount of investment is relatively small, which makes the program competitive. A special tax regime can be a major advantage of the program. There are several dozen investment programs in the world, and the investment requirements of each program differ significantly from each other. To obtain an investor visa in the UK, 2 million pounds, in the United States – from 500 thousand dollars, Portugal – from 250 thousand euros. The formation of the cost of the program is a complex process in which interests of the country and the realities of the investment immigration market “, – explains Irina Simonyan.
Economist Sergey Domain notes that the draft does not speak about obtaining Kazakhstani citizenship, but only about resident status. However, for citizens of some countries, it is not too difficult to obtain the status of a resident in Kazakhstan – for example, for Russians.
“Kazakhstan is positioning itself as a haven for investors and is trying to use all the tools to attract capital. Actually, this was the idea of the AIFC – to attract capital into the country by all available and legal means. Investment residence is one of the most common ways of raising capital in developing countries. One of the activities of the AIFC is private wealth management (perhaps, Kazakhstan’s residency will be a part — let’s call it that — a packaged product; Dealing with those foreigners who will become clients of the AIFC. Apparently, in the segment of private banking in the AIFC, they are primarily focused on clients from neighboring countries, including those who for some reason have been denied access to the European and Asian markets.
An employee of the Zertteu Research Institute, Sholpan Aytenova, supports the idea of creating a legal framework for investment residency. But he believes that it is necessary to change not only the legislation.
“This practice is common in the Baltic countries, Europe. Legal conditions should be to attract investment residency. But another question is whether foreign residents will be interested? Is Kazakhstan such an attractive country for such residency? At the moment, countries with a good investment climate are more interesting, with good conditions for doing business. On the other hand, judging by the Doing Business rating (in the Doing Business 2018 of the World Bank, Kazakhstan ranked 36th, in the Doing Business 2017 rating – 35th. – Auth . ) si This situation is improving, but there must also be other institutional conditions: economic, political, business conditions. “
On Tuesday, October 16, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) officially published a list of 21 jurisdictions that grant citizenship, residency or special visas for investments.
Without waiting for the recommendations of the European Commission regarding EU citizenship or residency programs for investments, the OECD, as the main fighter with tax evasion and offshore companies, was forced to admit that the effective result of its ten-year work to create a single reporting standard (CRS – Common Reporting Standard) and, finally, a real-life technical solution for automatic exchange may threaten the presence of individuals of several nationalities or residences. After all, an additional passport or residency allows the taxpayer to become a tax resident in a convenient jurisdiction solely for the purposes of bank compliance and not to pay taxes at home.
The OECD believes that it is the acquisition of citizenship or residency for investments that is the main threat to automatic exchange, since, unlike the procedures for obtaining a second passport or residence permit in the usual manner, this method takes much less time.
The question of the speed and ease of obtaining citizenship or residency for investment is, of course, debatable, since in some cases the state, when naturalizing or obtaining a residence permit in the usual manner, may make more modest demands. What can we say about “awarding” citizenship in a special manner to outstanding individuals whose earnings or welfare may be much higher than those who wish to acquire citizenship or residency under an investment program?
When a foreign passport is appropriate
The OECD recognizes that most often the interested persons pursue legitimate goals, for example, someone wants to start a business in a new state of their permanent residence, someone to expand their capabilities for visa-free travel, to provide the best education to their children. Finally, many want to move to a country with political stability.
Thus, if the person concerned really moves after permanently obtaining citizenship or residency for permanent residence in the state of its issuance, losing, for example, the tax residence of Russia, then, in that case, there is no question of any abuse of speech.
Many will ask the question: is there any obligation to notify the competent authorities about the loss of the status of a Russian tax residency? The answer is no. But it is better to withdraw from the permanent registration at the place of residence in the local unit of the competent internal affairs authority, which will automatically transfer the information to the tax inspectorate in order to remove the departed person from tax accounting.
In a more interesting position are people who obtain the citizenship of an EU member state, allowing them to freely live, work or conduct other economic activities in any country of the European Union. In this case, the situation for banks in terms of determining tax residency becomes more complex, and it is required to track where exactly this person lives.
Some states may indicate in their passports the place of permanent residence, but this does not always correspond to the real state of affairs due to the lack of physical borders within the EU.
Claims in essence
The OECD explicitly states that the main type of abuse of interested parties by their new citizenship or residency is issuing it for a single place of permanent residence, excluding another tax residency, usually in high tax jurisdictions, where they can also live a long time sufficient for them to be recognized by taxpayers with all the ensuing consequences.
The fact is that, according to CRS, in order to reveal the country of tax residence of a client of a bank (or other financial institution) to automatically transfer information about such a client to it, the applicant himself must honestly inform the bank in the form of self-certification whose taxpayer he is.
Thus, providing the new bank with a new passport, a new certificate or certificate of residency, the client, according to the OECD, may mislead the financial institution as to exactly where he should send the tax information he has.
Of particular concern to the OECD are states and jurisdictions that provide interested parties with the opportunity to pay personal income tax or personal income tax at a rate below 10%. For example, in Monaco and the UAE, there is no income tax for individuals at all. There are also claims to states that do not require to remain in their territory for at least 90 days in a calendar year to obtain the status of a local tax resident. A similar regime exists in Cyprus for persons who are 60 days in the calendar year on the island but not staying anywhere else in a particular country for more than 183 days.
How to solve the problem
Most banks already now assess their clients with the presence of permanent addresses, including the legal basis for their identification, as well as the presence of local telephone numbers of the country that the client indicated as tax jurisdiction.
Banks can also take into account the place where a significant number of transactions are performed by their customers, their frequency and the location of the counterparty. Data on actual water or electricity consumption, utility bills may be suitable for assessing the reality of a particular person in a particular place, and in some states, it may be public video tracking devices, such as this is possible in Monaco.
The OECD recommends that banks, in the presence of reasonable suspicion, ask four simple questions:
– Has the client of the bank received citizenship or residency for investments?
– Does the client have the right to reside in other states?
– Did the client live more than 90 days in another country in the previous year?
– in which jurisdiction did the client submit his tax return in the previous year?
In this regard, it is worth noting that, as a rule, people interested in acquiring citizenship for investments seek to achieve legitimate goals, therefore recommendations, of course, can be adopted by a number of banks, primarily in Switzerland.
It is known that, on the advice of a number of well-known Russian lawyers, many foreign banks even check the stamps on the entry and exit from the territory of Russia from Russian citizens in order to calculate their risks for the purposes of automatic exchange. Moreover, the practice includes a request for the provision of previously filed tax returns from individuals.
Collection agents are often associated with untouchable people who must be obeyed. The reality is that we should not be afraid of those people with whom it is even possible to negotiate. On the other hand, do not give the task of negotiation to a company or to a third party because it is possible to do it yourself. This may seem scary at first, but negotiating with the agent personally will save you a lot of money in the long run. Here are six tips for successful negotiation with the debt collector.
If you decide to negotiate with your collection agent, you must be well prepared and knowledgeable about your current financial situation. You need to know your monthly income, monthly expenses and other debts. This information is important to know because it will tell you how much money you can actually pay to your agent, either monthly or in a single payment. Start making a budget to see how much of your surplus income you have left after all expenses are paid. Having accurate numbers helps you negotiate better and saves you from accepting an offer that exceeds your ability to pay.
Have a hard skin
Although this task seems difficult, it may be the best way to negotiate. The law prescribes any physical abuse on the part of the officer towards you, but it does not prohibit the agent from being verbally aggressive. Collectors collect their money by taking back the money you owe and, believe it or not, they will do everything in their power to get it. Being mean is an integral part of the agent’s strategy. They want to humiliate you by calling you good for nothing or useless. Have a hard skin and do not succumb to these provocations.
Know the law
The federal and provincial governments have all developed legislation on the activities of debt collectors. For example, if an unsecured debt has not been paid on time, there can be no legal recourse. It is important that you know the laws in your province. If, for example, you have exceeded the time limit to repay, you are not legally obliged to pay your collection agent.
Do not make multiple payments
Although multiple payments may seem like a good idea, it can complicate the repayment process. If you negotiate with your collection agent to make multiple payments, this may result in the renewal of the period during which the repayment should be made, and this may also result in the possibility of legal recourse. Instead, use legal counsel to obtain all the information regarding multiple payments. Thus, you will be informed and ready to negotiate.
Bargaining is, in fact, one of the best options when you are trying to settle the debt with the debt collector. Do not forget! Your debt has been sold to collection agencies that will try to make even more money on your back. It is then plausible that these agencies exaggerate the value of your balance. Know the exact balance of your debt and, above all, do not give in to their first offer. Also, do not accept the possibility of monthly payments that your agent could offer you. Instead, you should negotiate a large single payment. Thus, you would have a better chance of getting a discount on the initial balance sheet. The salary of the collection agent is based on commissions, which means he wants to get your money back as soon as possible. As a result, they are more inclined to negotiate. In order for your negotiation to be successful, contact your collection agent personally at the end of the month. Usually, these agents have monthly quota fill. As a result, at the end of each month, they will be more open to negotiating and settling the account to fulfill their quota.
Ask for paper evidence
If you intend to settle the debt, you must absolutely obtain all documents and evidence in writing. If you agree to a reimbursement plan proposed by your agent, be sure to obtain a written version of the agreement. Also, make sure you make no payment without first receiving a written agreement. Finally, make sure that the written agreement makes it clear that following the payment, you will be released from your debt to the collection agency. Doing business with collection agents is not a pleasant thing. Agents want your money and will do whatever it takes to get it. On the other hand, by following our advice about trading, you will be able to get out of debt more easily and have more to do with these agencies and their agents.